2012-01-05 22:25 来源:CHINA DAILY 作者:许靖烯 阅读: 次 我要投稿
2012年1月2日,倪女士使用便携式手提宠物提包通过正常的机场安检以航空方式托运自己的宠物狗,但是小狗却在从北京出发到达海南省海口市国际机场后被枪射杀并惨死,小狗的主人和很多其他热爱动物的人士目前都仍在等待一个有关方针对这件事的一个让人信服的解释。
1月4日,机场方面在新浪官方微博上发布了一条信息称,小狗当时自己从宠物笼里跑了出来,之后就跑到了距离跑道大约100米的地方。机场处于安全方面的考虑,根据相关的安全规定不得不开枪把小狗打死。而本案的承运人海南航空也在其官方微博上发布信息称,在看完有关视频监控录像的回放以后同意机场方的对此事的解释。
CCTV也对该事件进行了报道。
美兰机场副总经理杨小斌的说:“小狗是从被关的笼子里跑出来,之后通过行李传送的入口后跑到飞机跑道上的。”
“我们试了10分钟的时间来抓小狗,但是没能抓住它。下午4点35分,小狗跑到飞机跑道上,但是当时中国南方航空公司CZ3120已经准备在1分钟以后降落了。”杨继续说,“出于安全方面的考虑,除了开枪打死小狗我们没有别的办法。” 杨小斌强调,机场的决定是根据有动物入侵紧急应对规定作出的。
小狗的主人倪斌说,事情发生以后她马上要求查看机场监控录像回放,但是被拒绝。
倪女士的女儿告诉记者,他们看到了大约15秒长的在行李间的监控录像,内容是小狗在跑,工作人员在后面追。同时她也被告知,行李间以外是没有监控录像的。
倪女士认为,很难想象一个重仅2公斤的小狗可以自己从坚固的笼子里逃脱。“即使真的是小狗自己跑出来的,要到外面去也必须通过推门才能做到。但是我们发现,门是向里开着的,而且皮带也是完好的。”她猜测,是机场的工作人员试图把小狗偷走。
北京顺捷通物流公司一位姓陈的先生说:“从小狗主人的女儿微博上看到的照片可以看出,笼子的门闩已经坏了,这很可能是由于机场人员在搬运时野蛮装卸造成的。”
同时,倪女士也不认为小狗是从一个很远的距离被枪打死的,“他的头上全是血,看上去好像是有人直接打他的头而致死的。”
海南航空公关部门的一位不愿意透露姓名的工作人员说,现在有必要将相关的监控录像公布出来了。但同时他又说,事主已经和海南航空公司签订了一份内容是“在宠物受伤或死亡时,免除海南航空公司的所有责任”的免责协议。
然而,张起淮律师认为,这样的一份协议有可能是不合法的。试图免除一方义务的协议有可能违反合同法的规定。”张律师师认为,美兰国际机场和承运人海南航空公司应当承担小狗死亡的全部责任。
美兰国际航空公司杨副总经理承认,公司员工应当接受专门培训,以应对再次出现小动物脱逃的情况。同时,“我们应当尽快给事主一个明确的解释,而不是让他们等了两天的时间。”他补充道。
以下是中国日报的原文报导:
BEIJING - The owner of a poodle and many other animal lovers are still waiting for a convincing explanation as to why a pet dog was shot dead in Meilan International Airport in Haikou, Hainan province, having traveled from Beijing in a portable kennel as checked baggage on Monday.
The airport released a statement on its official micro blog at Sina Weibo on Wednesday, saying the dog had escaped the kennel and reached the access road about 100 meters away from the runway. It had to be shot dead owing to security concerns, according to the rules.
Earlier on Wednesday, Hainan Airlines, the carrier, released a statement on its official micro blog, saying the company agreed with the airport's explanation after watching the surveillance video clips.
However, neither provided CCTV footage with the statements released.
According to Yang Xiaobin, the airport's vice-president, the pet dog escaped the kennel and ran all the way from the entrance of the baggage carousel toward the taxiway.
"We chased the dog for 10 minutes but failed to catch it. It's 4:35 pm when the dog ran into the taxiway and flight CZ3120 of China Southern Airlines was scheduled to land a minute later," said Yang. "To ensure air safety, we had no choice but to shoot the dog."
Yang emphasized that the airport was beyond reproach because the decision adhered to the emergency preparatory scheme on animal invasion in the airport's manual.
Ni Bin, 52, the dog's owner, said she asked for the surveillance video clips immediately after the incident, but was refused.
Ni's daughter said they were shown a 15-second video clip taken in the storehouse, in which the poodle was running and the staffers gave chase on Wednesday. She said she was told that there was no surveillance outside the storehouse on the road.
Ni found it hard to believe that a dog weighing 2 kilogram could break out of a solid flight case. "Even if my dog really dashed out of the case, the door would be pushed outwards. But we found that the door was opened inwards and the straps remained unbroken," said Ni.
She suspected that someone from the airport's staff was trying to steal the dog.
A person surnamed Chen, who works at Shun Jie Tong Air Freight Agent in Beijing, said: "From the pictures the owner's daughter published on her micro blog, it's very likely that the bolts were broken because of rough handling by the airport's staff."
Neither does Ni believe that her dog was shot dead from a long distance. "There was blood all over its head. It seemed as if someone had beaten it to death."
A staffer with the public relations department of Hainan Airlines who did not want to give his name said publishing the surveillance video clips was a necessity now.
But he added that the owner had signed an agreement with the company "which exempts Hainan Airlines from any responsibility in the event of an injury or death of the pet".
However, lawyer Zhang Qihuai says such agreements may not be legally binding.
"Disclaimers trying to exempt one party from its obligations could go against Contract Law," said Zhang.
In Zhang's opinion, Meilan International Airport and the carrier, Hainan Airlines, ought to take responsibility for the pet dog's death.
Meilan International Airport Vice-President Yang admitted that the staff should have been trained to do a better job of catching escaped pets.
Besides, "we should have given the owner a clear explanation promptly, instead of making her wait for two days," he added.
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|